Software-in-Loop & Hardware-in-Loop

SIL (MIL) and HIL testing techniques aim to verify requirements in their natural environment without reducing quality. Cost-effective testing solutions and high-quality standards are two sides of the same coin for a successful software project.
Let’s talk

SIL & HIL Testing Activities

Layered Testing Approach

Optimal way to enforce quality and reduce price of the SW product is to conduct multi-layered testing approach, which will perform in the background clustering of the test cases according to test levels.

Testing of the SW Logic

Most of the requirements refer to SW logic, and most of the time testers spend on testing the logic, therefore it is rational to test SW in natural Software-in-Loop environment.

HW Testbenches

We have hands-on Hardware-in-Loop test-benches, often expensive but necessary pieces of the equipment required by all embedded projects and for successful testing on physical HW to achieve highest quality requirements.

Testing with Simulators

Modern technology allow us to use various virtualization techniques to test SW on local computer or on the test farms and preserve almost 100% of the same conditions comparing to the target test HW, without having impact on overall testing quality.

Model-Based Testing

We have experience with testing of the SW Models using the high level design and testing tools integrated with the test frames designed using the Model-in-Loop techniques.

Restbus Simulation

Modeling and running of the communication model for simulation of the necessary runtime environment which is needed for target device under test using SIL or HIL approach.

Deliver frequently while maintaining the highest standards of quality

Contact us to plan your testing activities
Let's talk

Why Clients Choose Us

Experience of more then 10 years in real time systems using MIL/SIL/HIL test/runtime environment in various projects and industries and using many different technologies and testing frameworks.

We offer collaboration per FTE or in dedicated teams, with flexible execution of QA processes using different access policies: the testbench is located at the client’s site with a resident engineer, the testbench is set up at our premises, or the testbench is remotely accessible.

One of our company’s goals is to preserve testing know-how and to stimulate internal training, which allows us to quickly adapt to new challenges and ramp up teams.

We have experience in real-time systems modeling using SIL/HIL testing environments across various projects, and we provide critical expertise and consultancy to our future partners.

Clear, open communication is the foundation of successful collaboration. Our engineers actively engage in technical discussions, clarify assumptions, and work closely with you to align implementation decisions with business goals.

We go beyond the task list. We identify risks early, propose optimizations, automate workflow, and challenge assumptions to deliver better outcomes for our clients. We don’t wait for problems to surface; we prevent them.

Cooperation Models

FAQ

Yes. We have experience testing Simulink models using techniques such as Model-in-the-Loop, Software-in-the-Loop, and Hardware-in-the-Loop. We are also experienced in modeling the surrounding environment and creating testing frameworks for Simulink algorithms.
This is a difficult question that requires a good understanding of the target product. Without knowing the details, the best answer would be to use both techniques at different testing levels. SIL, as a cost-effective technique, should be used to test all logical conditions wherever applicable. HIL, on the other hand, should be used to verify the integration and integrity of the software on real physical hardware.
Yes. We can design and support HIL testbenches, but most of the time we reuse and customize existing solutions from other companies that provide physical test benches, such as dSPACE and MicroNova.
Yes. We document test plans, test specifications, design decisions, test versions, and integration steps to ensure full reproducibility and traceability. This discipline is essential for audits, safety standards, and long-term system evolution.
Yes. We have extensive experience in multi-vendor environments, working on projects where multiple teams from different companies had to align. We act as a technical bridge, coordinate interfaces, and reduce friction to keep development on track.
Yes. We maintain stability while adapting systems for new features, component changes, or minor series variations – keeping control systems robust as they evolve.