Automotive Functional Safety

Safety-compliant embedded solutions that meet ASIL requirements – without compromising on performance or delivery timelines. Trusted by clients for our hands-on ISO 26262 experience.
Let’s talk

Safety-Driven Engineering You Can Trust

Embedded systems development that complies with functional safety standards such as ISO 26262 and IEC 61508. Whether you’re targeting ASIL (A-D) or SIL (1-4), we support safety across software, hardware, and system levels. Our engineers combine deep technical expertise with a practical, process-aligned approach that keeps safety manageable – even in fast-paced development cycles.

Safety Concept Development

Safety concept development – functional and technical safety concepts defined following hazard analysis – including safety goals, ASIL allocation, and preliminary safety mechanisms.

ISO 26262 Compliance Support

ISO 26262 compliance support – meeting requirements across all safety lifecycle phases, from item definition to SOP – including process tailoring, work product preparation, and gap analysis.

Hazard & Risk Analysis (HARA)

Structured hazard and risk assessments – identification of safety-relevant functions and ASIL assignment – traceable, auditable analysis aligned with system requirements.

Software Safety Requirements & Architecture

Software safety requirements derived from FSC, ensuring traceability to safety goals and design software architecture with an appropriate decomposition, FFI and fault detection mechanisms.

Safety Mechanism Implementation

Design and implementation of software and hardware safety mechanisms – including watchdogs, runtime checks, redundancy, and degradation strategies – based on defined safety concepts.

Safety Assessment Preparation

Preparation for both internal and third-party safety assessments – reviewing safety artifacts, simulating audit scenarios, and identifying gaps – ensuring a smooth certification process with no surprises.

Transform your idea into a working product

Contact us for a free roadmap for bringing your idea to life.
Let's talk

Why Clients Choose Us

We’ve supported safety-critical projects across ASIL levels, from concept phase to SOP. Our familiarity with both technical and process-related requirements helps clients avoid costly missteps.

We approach functional safety as engineers first – prioritizing practicality, maintainability, and system performance while meeting compliance goals. Safety is not just another item on a checklist.

We don’t just deliver templates or reviews – we help implement safety mechanisms, refactor code, and improve architecture. Clients rely on us when safety must translate into working code.

We provide safety documentation that’s clear, traceable, and aligned with both ASPICE and ISO 26262. Whether for internal reviews or third-party assessments, we help you stay prepared and compliant.

Clear, open communication is the foundation of successful collaboration. Our engineers actively engage in discussions and work closely with you to align technical decisions with business goals.

We go beyond the task list. We identify risks early, propose optimizations, and challenge assumptions to deliver better outcomes for our clients. We don’t wait for problems to surface; we prevent them.

Cooperation Models

FAQ

Yes. We cover the full safety lifecycle – from concept/item definition, through HARA analysis, safety concept development, architecture design, implementation, validation and production support.
Absolutely. We often support projects mid-lifecycle by reviewing work products, identifying gaps, and helping teams realign with safety goals and maintain compliance with the assigned ASIL/SIL targets.
Yes. We design and implement runtime checks, monitoring logic, watchdogs, and other mechanisms aligned with the assigned ASIL level and defined in the safety concept.
Yes. We support internal and third-party assessments by reviewing documentation (work products and safety artifacts), simulating audit scenarios, and closing identified gaps.
Yes. We apply decomposition strategies and validate timing, memory, and data isolation between safety-critical and non-critical components in line with ISO26262-9 requirements.
Yes. We adapt to your safety processes, templates, toolchains, and collaboration platforms – whether you’re using standard frameworks or custom workflows.

Tell Us About Your Project

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Privacy Policy*
Contact Synchrotek